Lesniewski's early Liar, Tarski and natural language

نویسنده

  • Arianna Betti
چکیده

This paper is a contribution to the reconstruction of Tarski’s semantic background and to the history of metalanguage and truth. Although in his 1933 monograph Tarski credits his master, Stanisław Leśniewski, with crucial negative results on the semantics of natural language, the conceptual relationship between the two logicians has never been investigated in a thorough manner. This paper shows that it was not Tarski, but Leśniewski who first avowed the impossibility of giving a satisfactory theory of truth for ordinary language, and the necessity of sanitation of the latter for scientific purposes. In an early article (1913) Leśniewski gave an interesting solution to the Liar Paradox, which, although different from Tarski's in detail, is nevertheless important to Tarski's semantic background. To illustrate this I give an analysis of Leśniewski’s solution and of some related aspects of Leśniewski’s later thought.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Liar and the Inconsistency of Language

A fairly common assumption about the Liar paradox is that it is a formal problem that can be safely delegated to mathematical logicians, and that its proper resolution can be trusted not to disrupt anyone else’s philosophical theories and projects. Serious students of the Liar know better. While purely formal approaches to the Liar abound, it is not a purely formal problem. Philosophical interp...

متن کامل

A Contextual-Hierarchical Approach to Truth and the Liar Paradox

This paper presents an approach to truth and the Liar paradox which combines elements of context dependence and hierarchy. This approach is developed formally, using the techniques of model theory in admissible sets. Special attention is paid to showing how starting with some ideas about context drawn from linguistics and philosophy of language, we can see the Liar sentence to be context depend...

متن کامل

Self-Referencing Languages Revisited

Paradoxes, particularly Tarski’s liar paradox, represent an ongoing challenge have long attracted special interest. There have been numerous attempts to give either a formal or a more realistic resolution to this area based on natural logical intuition or common sense. The present semantic analysis of the problem components concludes that the traditional language of logic fails to detect Tarski...

متن کامل

Gödel, Tarski, Church, and the Liar

'What is a sadist? A sadist is a person who is kind to a masochist.' When I first heard this joke, I smiled, of course, realizing that the brutality of the sadist is, in fact, kindness to a masochist, which is the source of the comic effect being a(n apparent) contradiction resolved. What I did not realize was that I would have had another reason to smile: the kindness of the sadist tortures th...

متن کامل

AOP and the Antinomy of the Liar

Unless explicitly prevented, aspects can apply to themselves and can therefore change their own behaviour. This self-adaptation can lead to syntactically correct programs that express antinomies, i.e., that are meaningless (have no intuitive semantics). Drawing the parallel to mathematical logic, we suggest adopting the classical solution presented by Russell and Tarski, i.e., the separation of...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Ann. Pure Appl. Logic

دوره 127  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004